Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Prognostic Scales: The Impact of Exercise Modality in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Tests.

The cardiopulmonary exercise (CPET) test is an essential tool to determine the severity, prognosis, and need for invasive treatments in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but disregards the exercise modality. The present study aimed at analyzing the differences between treadmill and cycle-ergometer exercises. This was a prospective study, involving 65 patients with HfrEF who performed treadmill exercise followed by cycle-ergometer exercise 72 h later. We enrolled 65 patients, aged 58 ± 9 years, with an ejection fraction of 29 ± 9%. Peak VO2 was 20% greater (95% CI: 18−21%; p < 0.000) on the treadmill, and the ventilatory efficiency estimated by the VE/VCO2 slope (32 ± 8 vs. 34 ± 9; p < 0.05). The ventilatory response was greater on the treadmill: maximum ventilation (55 ± 16 vs. 46 ± 11 L/min; p < 0.000) and ventilatory reserve at the maximum effort (28 ± 17 vs. 41 ± 15%; p < 0.000). These values led to a change in the functional class of 23 (51%) patients and ventilatory class of 28 (47%) patients. Differences in the main parameters, including peak VO2 and VE/VCO2, impact prognostic scales and possible advanced treatments; therefore, the results should be interpreted in accordance with the exercise modality.

Biopsy of Intrapulmonary Lesions in Lungs with Atelectasis and Pleural Effusion / Biopsia de lesiones intrapulmonares en pulmones con atelectasia y derrame pleural

No disponible

PCR en esputo para el diagnóstico de COVID-19 en un caso con patrón radiológico infrecuente / PCR in Sputum for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in a Case with Infrequent Radiological Pattern

No disponible

Assessment of risk scores in Covid-19.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the accuracy of commonly used risk scores (PSI and CURB-65) in predicting mortality and need for ICU admission in Covid-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of patients diagnosed with Covid-19 pneumonia. Patients were followed until home discharge or death. PSI, CURB-65, SMART-COP and MuLBSTA severity scores were assessed on admission. Risk scores were related to mortality and ICU admission. RESULTS: About 249 patients, 143 males (57.4%) were included. The mean age was 65.6 + 16.1 years. Factors associates with mortality in the multivariate analysis were age > 80 years (OR: 13.9; 95% CI 3.8-51.1) (P = .000), lymphocytes < 800 (OR: 2.9; CI 95% 1.1-7-9) (P = .040), confusion (OR: 6.3; 95% CI 1.6-24.7) (P = .008) and NT-proBNP > 500 pg/mL (OR: 10.1; 95% CI 1.1-63.1) (P = .039). In predicting mortality, the PSI score: AUC 0.874 (95% CI 0.808-0.939) and the CURB-65 score: AUC 0.852 (95% CI 0.794-0.909) were the ones that obtained the best results. In the need for ICU admission, the SMART-COP score: AUC 0.749 (95% CI 0.695-0.820) and the MuLBSTA score: AUC 0.777 (95% CI 0.713-0.840) were the ones that obtained better results, with significant differences with PSI and CURB-65. The scores with the lowest value for ICU admission prediction were PSI with AUC of 0.620 (95% CI 0.549-0.690) and CURB-65 with AUC of 0.604 (95% CI 0.528-0.680). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis scores routinely used for CAP (PSI and CURB-65) were good predictors for mortality in patients with Covid-19 CAP but not for need of hospitalisation or ICU admission. In the evaluation of Covid-19 pneumonia, we need scores that allow to decide the appropriate level of care.

Impacto clínico de una unidad de patología pleural en un hospital de tercer nivel / Clinical Impact of a Pleural Unit in a Tertiary Level Hospital

INTRODUCCIÓN: La enfermedad pleural conlleva un gran número de ingresos y elevadas estancias hospitalarias. Con el fin de mejorar esto, se creó en nuestro hospital una unidad de patología pleural (UPP). Nuestro objetivo es analizar el impacto clínico de dicha unidad. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo en el que incluimos a los pacientes ingresados en la UPP del Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias por neumotórax espontáneo primario (NEP), secundario (NES), derrame pleural paraneumónico complicado (DPPC) y derrame pleural maligno (DPM), entre enero de 2015 y diciembre de 2018. Analizamos parámetros descriptivos, estancias medias, reingresos al mes, necesidad de cirugía y, en los DPPC, también la mortalidad hospitalaria. Los datos se compararon con los de los pacientes ingresados por la misma enfermedad en neumología durante los 2 años previos (2013-2014). Describimos además todos los procedimientos realizados en la UPP, tanto ambulatorios como en pacientes ingresados. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 741 pacientes. Objetivamos una disminución progresiva de los ingresos totales por enfermedad pleural y de la estancia media (días) en dichas afecciones, excepto en el DPM: NEP de 6,2 a 4,2 (p = 0,004), NES de 13,2 a 8,6 (p = 0,005), DPM de 10,3 a 12,3 (p = 0,05) y DPPC de 18,3 a 11,3 (p = 0,001). Existió una reducción de los reingresos al mes y de la mortalidad hospitalaria por DPPC en el periodo de la UPP (14,9% al 5,5%) (p = 0,021). CONCLUSIONES: La creación de una UPP podría disminuir el número de ingresos innecesarios, favoreciendo una reducción de las estancias medias y, en los DPPC, también la mortalidad hospitalaria

INTRODUCTION: Pleural disease involves a large number of admissions and long hospital stays. In order to improve this situation, a Pleural Unit (PU) was created in our hospital. Our aim was to analyze the clinical impact of this unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study, we included patients admitted to the PU of the Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) between January 2015 and December 2018. We analyzed descriptive parameters, mean length of stay, readmissions at 1 month, need for surgery, and in the CPPE group, in-hospital mortality. The data were compared with those of patients admitted to the respiratory medicine department for the same diseases during the previous two years (2013-2014). We also describe all procedures performed in the PU, in both inpatients and outpatients. RESULTS: A total of 741 patients were included, We observed a progressive decrease in total admissions for pleural diseases and mean length of stay (days) (with the exception of MPE), as follows: PSP: from 6.2 to 4.2 (P = .004); SSP: 13.2 to 8.6 (P = .005), MPE: 10.3 to 12.3 (P = .05); and CPPE: 18.3 to 11.3 (P = .001) There was a reduction in hospital readmissions at 1 month and in in-hospital mortality due to CPPE in the PU period (14.9% to 5.5%) (P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a PU could decrease the number of unnecessary admissions, and reduce mean lengths of stay and, in the case of CPPE, in-hospital mortality

Clinical Impact of a Pleural Unit in a Tertiary Level Hospital. / Impacto clínico de una unidad de patología pleural en un hospital de tercer nivel.

INTRODUCTION: Pleural disease involves a large number of admissions and long hospital stays. In order to improve this situation, a Pleural Unit (PU) was created in our hospital. Our aim was to analyze the clinical impact of this unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study, we included patients admitted to the PU of the Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP), secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP), complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE), and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) between January 2015 and December 2018. We analyzed descriptive parameters, mean length of stay, readmissions at 1 month, need for surgery, and in the CPPE group, in-hospital mortality. The data were compared with those of patients admitted to the respiratory medicine department for the same diseases during the previous two years (2013-2014). We also describe all procedures performed in the PU, in both inpatients and outpatients. RESULTS: A total of 741 patients were included, We observed a progressive decrease in total admissions for pleural diseases and mean length of stay (days) (with the exception of MPE), as follows: PSP: from 6.2 to 4.2 (P=.004); SSP: 13.2 to 8.6 (P=.005), MPE: 10.3 to 12.3 (P=.05); and CPPE: 18.3 to 11.3 (P=.001) There was a reduction in hospital readmissions at 1 month and in in-hospital mortality due to CPPE in the PU period (14.9% to 5.5%) (P=.021). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a PU could decrease the number of unnecessary admissions, and reduce mean lengths of stay and, in the case of CPPE, in-hospital mortality.

Fibrinólisis ambulatoria en el manejo del derrame maligno multiseptado / Ambulatory Fibrinolysis in the Management of Septated Malignant Effusions

No disponible

Importancia del manejo especializado en el destete prolongado / The Importance of Highly Specific Management in Prolonged Weaning

No disponible